Taken on Flic Film Elektra 100 with a Canon Rebel 2000. Feb 2026.
This page simply reformats the Flickr public Atom feed for purposes of finding inspiration through random exploration. These images are not being copied or stored in any way by this website, nor are any links to them or any metadata about them. All images are © their owners unless otherwise specified.
This site is a busybee project and is supported by the generosity of viewers like you.
Taken on Flic Film Elektra 100 with a Canon Rebel 2000. Feb 2026.
Taken on Flic Film Elektra 100 with a Canon Rebel 2000. Feb 2026.
Taken on Flic Film Elektra 100 with a Canon Rebel 2000. Feb 2026.
Clean paint is always nice to see, even if that scheme has an awful lot of "CP" and very little "KCS" in it. Former Soo Line 4412 was one of the very first geeps to get the new paint, and looks like it has even gotten a recent wash given the total lack of road grime compared to when I saw it on my trip in October. It and a KCS mate have charge of a good-sized Rankin Turn, with the conductor at the ready to line the route as they return to High Oak Yard in Pearl.
The chalkboards show menu items like "Æggekager" (egg cakes/omelets) and "Stjerneskud" (a traditional Danish open-faced sandwich). The green sign announces "ÅBNER 12.15" (Opens 12:15) and "Drikkevarer fra 11" (Drinks from 11).
I know it is. I've tried shooting and developping and scanning film at home before, and I never really had the mental energy for it - and I don't have the money to send everything to a lab either.
I know I won't probably stick to it if I try again. And my "keepers' rate" is extremely low in analog compared to what it is on digital anyway, so it's a stupid move. And it always takes me months to end a roll of film too. And besides, I often can get similar results when I shoot film and digital side by side with the same EF lenses, so what's the point ?
I don't know. I just don't feel the same thing when I look at the images. I don't feel "proud" when they're shot on digital. I don't feel happy. I don't feel satisfied with the results, however technically good they are, or even when I got the moment I wanted because of the autofocus and aperture priority and all that. It's just not satisfying, or fulfilling.
But if I invest again in analog gear (because I've stupidly sold it all a few months ago), it will probably just be the same...
I really can't make up my mind. But what's the point of creating something you're not happy with ?
Olympus OM2, 50mm 1.4 or 135mm 2.8, I don't remember. HP5 at 3200 in Rodinal 1+50.
Polar Bear Exhibit 3
Flahback to the Summer of 2000
Rio Grande Zoo
Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Shot with a Minolta CLE
Voigtländer Nokton Classic 35mm f/1.4 lens
Kodak Vision3 500T film
Shot at EI 500
Developed by the Atlanta Film Company (ECN-2 process)
Scanned on a Super Coolscan 5000ED
Taken on Flic Film Elektra 100 with a Canon Rebel 2000. February 2026.
Taken on Flic Film Elektra 100 with a Canon Rebel 2000. February 2026.
Taken on Flic Film Elektra 100 with a Canon Rebel 2000. February 2026.
