The Flickr Umbilicals Image Generatr

About

This page simply reformats the Flickr public Atom feed for purposes of finding inspiration through random exploration. These images are not being copied or stored in any way by this website, nor are any links to them or any metadata about them. All images are © their owners unless otherwise specified.

This site is a busybee project and is supported by the generosity of viewers like you.

Echo1_v_bw_o_n (ca. 1960, unnumbered NASA photo) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

Echo1_v_bw_o_n (ca. 1960, unnumbered NASA photo)

A clever, well-composed photo of Thor-Delta 144 on Launch Complex 17A. If the stamped date on the verso is accurate, four days later, on May 13, 1960, the vehicle was launched with its payload, the Echo 1 satellite.

“The mission, which was also the maiden voyage of the Thor-Delta launch vehicle, failed before deployment of the payload. The Thor stage performed properly, but during the coast phase, the attitude control jets on the unproven Delta stage failed to ignite, sending the payload into the Atlantic Ocean instead of into orbit.”

Above paraphrased from the following:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Echo
Credit: Wikipedia

The follow-up attempt, Echo 1A, was successfully launched on August 12, 1960.

Inexplicable mild waviness of the photo paper along the bottom edge does not detract.

www.thisdayinaviation.com/12-august-1960-2/
Credit: “This Day In Aviation” website

SV5-PRIME+_v_c_v_n (ca. 1965-67, Martin Co. photo) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

SV5-PRIME+_v_c_v_n (ca. 1965-67, Martin Co. photo)

“Space Logistics Vehicle”

Also, per Ed Dempsey (so you know it’s spot-on), and his posting of the image (linked below):

“Martin Co, art showing a sophisticated lifting body manned spacecraft with two astronauts going EVA.

From an optimistic time, when aeronautical engineers, basing much of their work off captured German WWII aeronautical data, were certain that most spacecraft would return to land on runways. Some were still convinced that they could develop engines that could land and takeoff from runways. The problems turned out to be a lot harder (and more expensive) to solve than they ever dreamed.

More recently, the Shuttle program has pretty much proven that such a spacecraft is still not practical. All the new spacecraft designs have returned to the modified ballistic reentry used in the 1960's. The lifting body concept is still valid. It has been flown by the US and Russia, but only as an experimental manned vehicle. Small, unmanned, lifting bodies have been ( and are being) flown into and out of orbit, but a runway to orbit and back manned vehicle still seems just out of reach.

Then again, who REALLY knows what goes on at shops like the Skunk Works and at Area 51?”

8.5” x 11”, on standard weight ‘printer paper’, which looks to be a ‘first generation’ copy of the magnificent original artwork by Frank R. DiPietro. Most importantly, this photo was graciously provided through the amazing generosity of Frank DiPietro, Mr. DiPietro’s son. A WIN+++++!!!!!

Multiple goodness going on in this masterpiece. Note the quad solid? rocket assist takeoff motors at the bottom aft of the vehicle. Also, what (to me) looks like a green, domed porthole/observation window at the upper starboard fuselage.
Then there are the small elevons on the two rudders, much like that of the M2-F1 lifting body. I don't know my lifting body lineage nor have the gumption to get smart enough to ascertain if they were considered, or if its subtle/clever artistic license. Either way, it's outstanding...along with no forward windscreen/window being visible. Maybe a/the protective panel/shield is jettisoned prior to re-entry, like that of the X-20 Dynasoar. Again, who cares! And the markings, colors, numbering...it's the whole visual package.
And finally, the Astronauts...although tethered, they're wearing 'mini-AMU's'. In fact, the exhaust plume of the nearer Astronaut's AMU is visible...and it's firing with NO HANDS-ON input! Plausible? NO. Dangerous? YES. TOO TOO COOL? HELL YEAH!
And to finish it off, the colorful & dynamic cosmic "void".

THANK YOU Frank R. DiPietro.

IMP1_v_bw_o_n (63-IMP-23) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

IMP1_v_bw_o_n (63-IMP-23)

“The Delta launch vehicle stands ready on Launch Pad 17A to send the first of the IMP series satellites into Earth orbit. The 138-pound Interplanetary Explorer satellite will measure magnetic fields, cosmic rays, and solar winds in interplanetary space.

I love the late 50’s/early 60’s black & white dawn/dusk/night photographs taken of the missiles & rockets being prepped for or during launch from Cape Canaveral. Some of the most wonderfully creative photography in the name of documentation by the likes of Chuck Rogers & multiple (sadly obscure & mostly unknown) others. Yeah, not unlike the artists…damnit.

Like on this one; the bank of searchlights & their beams revealed by the fog, mist, haze…whatever it is, the exquisite detail of men & machine, and in this particular photograph, the play of multiple overlapping shadows – I assume from the bank of searchlights unseen to the left – cast on the rocket by the umbilical mast & its cabling. Maybe a several second exposure? Exquisite…photographic art.

Payload details:

space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/explorer_imp-a.htm
Credit: Gunter’s Space Page

nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraft/display.action?id=1963...
Credit: NSSDCA website

MORL/MOL/ARIES_v_bw_o_n (1963 press/poss. Martin Co. photo) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

MORL/MOL/ARIES_v_bw_o_n (1963 press/poss. Martin Co. photo)

“Wonders of The Universe:

A vital link in the space field, the Manned Orbital Research Laboratory (MORL) is being revived by both the [missing] and NASA with h[missing] the immediate future [missing] …tive program will [missing]
The Air Force w[missing] undertake this project to explore the military mission in space, while NASA would like to undertake this project to perform vital experiments in space which must be completed before the manned exploration of the planets is attempted.
One fact which is not too well known is that NASA probably would have initiated plans for a space station some time ago and would have been well along in their planning except for the priority which President Kennedy assigned to the Apollo project. However, the establishment of a space station was visualized as being so rewarding that NASA already had begun to develop the comprehensive technological foundation for this venture.”

Above per Dr. I. M. Levitt, Director, Franklin Institute, Philadelphia…once again with artistic accompaniment by Mr. John Gorsuch.

I think/thought the depiction is/was of Martin Company’s Authentic Reproduction of an Independent Earth Satellite (ARIES). But then again, MOL maybe? I do associate Gemini with MOL. They all sort of blur together to me now. Who knows.

What really matters is that this is yet another John Gorsuch work.
With that said, a wonderful profile, with what little is available on this remarkably talented & prolific artist:

e05.code.blog/2021/09/28/artist-profile-john-gorsuch/
Credit: numbers station blog

See also. A wonderful site I too often overlook:

elpoderdelasgalaxias.wordpress.com/2013/11/14/empress-of-...
Credit: "THE DREAMY DODO" website

vik07_v_bw_o_n (original 1951 Navy photo, USN-708340) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

vik07_v_bw_o_n (original 1951 Navy photo, USN-708340)

“Looking down on the U.S. Navy’s 5 1/2-ton, 48 foot long Martin Viking rocket from the gantry which was used to prepare the rocket for its world’s record breaking altitude flight of 135 miles. The Viking, No. 7 of 10 to be built by the Glenn L. Martin Co. for the Naval Research Lab., reached a top speed of 4100 miles per hour. Previous record for high-altitude rockets was the German V-2 which reached a altitude of 114 miles.”

TIROS X_v_bw_o_n (102-KSC-65P-131) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

TIROS X_v_bw_o_n (102-KSC-65P-131)

"NASA's reliable Delta launch vehicle undergoes final checkout in preparation for the TIROS (10) weather satellite launching, from Pad-17. Pre-launch is handled by Douglas Aircraft Company, prime contractor under direction of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center's, Launch Operation Division."

The following at:
science.nasa.gov/missions/tiros

"TIROS-10
Objectives: Further the testing of the TIROS system in preparation of the weather Bureau's completely operational TOS (TIROS Operational Satellite) system, and to privde maximum satellite coverage during the 1965 hurricane season.

Description: The spacecraft was 42 inches in diameter, 19 inches high and weighed 270 pounds. The craft was made of aluminum alloy and stainless steel then covered by 9200 solar cells. The solar cells served to charge the nickel-cadmium (nicad) batteries. Three pairs of solid-propellant spin rockets were mounted on the base plate. This was the heaviest satellite launched at this time.

The configuration of the TIROS-10 was similar to that of TIROS-8, with the cameras mounted on the base plate. The craft was placed in its planned Sun-synchronous retrograde orbit, drifting westward about 1 degree per day (the same rate and direction as the Earth moves around the Sun), which provided maximum lighting for photography and battery charging.

TIROS-10 was the last of the experimental TIROS series and provided more than 400 images daily, each of a 640,000-square mile area with 2-mile resolution at the center.

Participants: NASA, RCA, US Weather Bureau

TIROS-10 Stats:

Launch Date: July 2, 1965
Operational Period: 730 days before being deactivated by NASA along with TIROS-8 on July 1, 1967
Launch Vehicle: Three-stage Delta
Launch Site: Cape Canaveral, FL
Type: Weather Satellite"

sa06 (AS-101)_v_bw_o_n (64-SA6-22) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

sa06 (AS-101)_v_bw_o_n (64-SA6-22)

Towering 190 feet over launch complex 37, the Apollo/Saturn I vehicle (SA-6) undergoes Radio Frequency Interference test. The flight test of SA-6, scheduled for late this spring, will be the first of a series in the Apollo program which will place Americans on the moon by 1970."

sa05_v_c_o_AKP (hand annotated C-400-3, JFK at Cape Canaveral, 16 November 1963) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

sa05_v_c_o_AKP (hand annotated C-400-3, JFK at Cape Canaveral, 16 November 1963)

President John F. Kennedy is briefed by Dr. Wernher von Braun regarding the Saturn rocket (with SA-5 on the pad at the time) at Pad B, Complex 37, Cape Canaveral, Florida. (L-R): An unidentified (mostly obscured) individual; Senator George Smathers of Florida;, Major General (MG) Chester V. Clifton, Military Aide to the President; President Kennedy (back to camera); Dr. von Braun, Director, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC).

The above description is meant to be similar to those of the other photos taken during President Kennedy’s 16 November 1963 inspection/tour of Cape Canaveral.

I believe this photograph was/is probably considered an outtake, as a result of MG Clifton unintentionally photobombing the shot. The hand-annotated number on the verso is consistent with the JFK Library numbering of other photos taken during the inspection/tour. However, it yields no return when queried at the library’s website.

5" x 7".

jupc-junoi_v_bw_o_n (PL 58-44353) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

jupc-junoi_v_bw_o_n (PL 58-44353)

"View of Jupiter C Explorer prior to launch.
Photo by: Rogers"

The payload was Explorer IV:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explorer_4
Credit: Wikipedia

The Explorer family:

nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/multi/explorer.html

Launch vehicle:

www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/app4/juno.html

www.spaceline.org/rocketsum/juno-I.html

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juno_I
Credit: Wikipedia

Launch photo:

moonandback.com/2011/06/05/jupiter-a-crash-program-to-orb...

AS-202_v_bw_o_n (MAF PAO photo, no. 11851-4, 8-25-66) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

AS-202_v_bw_o_n (MAF PAO photo, no. 11851-4, 8-25-66)

“The third two-stage Uprated Saturn I (AS-202) lifts off its launch pad at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center, Fla., in a successful sub-orbital flight. The launch successfully tested the Apollo spacecraft’s ablative heatshield during a long re-entry flight. Project Apollo is the United States’ program to land a man on the moon and return him safely to earth in decade. Generating 1.6 million pounds of thrust at liftoff, the first stage of the 224-foot-tall Uprated Saturn I was produced by the Chrysler Corporation Space Division at NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans. Michoud, a division of the George C. Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., is also the assembly site of the more powerful Saturn V first stage rocket employed in Project Apollo.”

sa500F_v_bw_o_n (66-H-962) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

sa500F_v_bw_o_n (66-H-962)

“Atop the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s 365-foot-tall Saturn V facilities vehicle the Lunar Module [Command and Service Module] and escape tower are shown. Approaching the pad is the 415 foot-high arming tower being moved by a 3,000 ton crawler transporter. Preparations at Complex 39 are underway using the Saturn 500-F facilities vehicle to verify launch facilities, train launch crews, and develop test and checkout procedures.”

“Arming Tower”…hmmm…would it have still been referred to as such, in 1966?

a04 (AS-501)_v_bw_o_n (67-H-1198) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

a04 (AS-501)_v_bw_o_n (67-H-1198)

“SITTING ON THE PAD: Ground servicing lines frame the 363-foot Apollo/Saturn V spacecraft, scheduled to make its first test flight later this quarter at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Kennedy Space Center, Fla.”

Absolutely striking in color:

i-h1.pinimg.com/736x/99/e6/09/99e609a941dc58c577654a7a587...
Credit: Pinterest/StarTalk Radio from Retro Space Images

Yet another excellent composition by an anonymous NASA photographer...of an extremely important & historic rocket.

sa04_v_bw_o_n (poss Marshall Photo 3-670-(3), hand-annotated) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

sa04_v_bw_o_n (poss Marshall Photo 3-670-(3), hand-annotated)

“The fourth Saturn I space vehicle (SA-4), on its launch pedestal at Cape Canaveral, is scheduled for launch in the next several days, no earlier than March 28. The vehicle will be launched by the NASA Launch Operations Center and the NASA-Marshall Space Flight Center.”

vgd tv-3_v_bw_o_n (original 1957 press photo) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

vgd tv-3_v_bw_o_n (original 1957 press photo)

“Last minute checks are made on the Vanguard missile in preparation to sending aloft the first U.S. test satellite yesterday. The countdown was nearing zero when all that remained was to press the button. Then the rocket misfired and the attempt ended in a fiery failure.”

7" x 9".

Per the NSSDCA website, at:

nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraftDisplay.do?id=VAGT3

"Vanguard Test Vehicle 3 (TV3) was the first U.S. attempt to launch a satellite into orbit around the Earth. It was a small satellite designed to test the launch capabilities of a three-stage launch vehicle and study the effects of the environment on a satellite and its systems in Earth orbit. It also was to be used to study micrometeor impacts and to obtain geodetic measurements through orbit analysis. The IGY Vanguard satellite program was designed with the purpose of launching one or more Earth orbiting satellites during the International Geophysical Year (IGY).

At launch on 6 December 1957 at 16:44:34 UT at the Atlantic Missile Range in Cape Canaveral, Florida, the booster ignited and began to rise but about 2 seconds after liftoff, after rising about a meter, the rocket lost thrust and began to settle back down to the launch pad. As it settled against the launch pad the fuel tanks ruptured and exploded, destroying the rocket and severely damaging the launch pad. The Vanguard satellite was thrown clear and landed on the ground a short distance away with its transmitters still sending out a beacon signal. The satellite was damaged, however, and could not be reused. It is now on display at the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum.

The exact cause of the accident was never determined, presumably it was due to a fuel leak between the fuel tank and the rocket engine, possibly due to a loose connection in a fuel line or low fuel pump inlet pressure allowing some of the burning fuel in the thrust chamber to leak back into the fuel tank."

jup_v_bw_o_n (PL 58-45332) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

jup_v_bw_o_n (PL 58-45332)

Jupiter AM-N??? The date of the photo coincides with the launch of Jupiter AM-7. However, this is definitely an 'N', which I can find nothing on.

AM-N markings = AM-7 vehicle???

Maybe 'N' for...nuclear...so possibly a covert TS/SCI, "EYES ONLY" launch? That's gotta be it! It even has the wrong date/location hand annotated along the bottom white border to throw the casual observer off. Brilliant misdirection & OPSEC!

mer_v_bw_o_n (DA-I-8, 60-224, Little Joe 6, L-59-5136 eq) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

mer_v_bw_o_n (DA-I-8, 60-224, Little Joe 6, L-59-5136 eq)

“This is Little Joe, the rocket on which many of the tests of the Project Mercury capsule were made. These launchings were at Wallops Island, Va. At the left of the rocket is the umbilical tower through which electrical circuits are made. This falls away as zero is reached in the count-down and the rocket blasts away.”

Little Joe 6, a Launch Escape System test of the Mercury spacecraft, prior to launch from Wallops Island, VA, 4 October 1959.

See also:

Additional photo/information at:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Joe_(rocket)

With a beautiful clean digital version of the photo:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Joe_(rocket)#/media/File:Little_Joe_on_launcher_at_Wallops_Island_-_GPN-2000-001883.jpg

Additional photos/information at:

history.nasa.gov/SP-4201/ch7-7.htm

www.wikiwand.com/en/Little_Joe_6

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Joe_6

a15_v_bw_o_n (107-KSC-371-174/31) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

a15_v_bw_o_n (107-KSC-371-174/31)

This is interesting: “The Apollo 15 Saturn V launch vehicle with boilerplate spacecraft was moved from the VAB’s High Bay 1 to High Bay 3 today. Purpose of move was to prepare the VAB for Skylab program modifications.”

The referenced boilerplate was good old M-11…from SA-500F fame. Note also the partial launch escape system tower.

Who knew?!

Pertinent thread:

www.collectspace.com/ubb/Forum29/HTML/001740.html
Credit: collectSPACE website

pio03_v_bw_o_n (PL 58-48752) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

pio03_v_bw_o_n (PL 58-48752)

"CCMTA, Pad 5, ABMA / Pre-launch of Juno II, Lunar Probe / Photo by: Rogers"

A TOTALLY AWESOME photo - especially for 1958.
One of MANY MANY fantastic photos of various missiles/rockets during this time period by Mr. Rogers! When the photographs were actually attributed to the photographers on the verso. As a result, I'd like to think that his name, along with a few other Cape photographers of the time, are at least fading into oblivion a little less quickly. Like the numerous NASA & contractor artists, sad nonetheless.

Juno II vehicle (AM-11) boosted the 15-pound Pioneer 3 lunar probe from Cape Canaveral, Launch Complex 5 at 0044L (05:44:52 GMT ) hours, 6 December 1958. Most of the mission‘s objectives were accomplished, but the first stage burn ended 3.7 seconds early. Consequently, the probe did not reach the vicinity of the Moon as intended, but it managed to fly part of the way (e.g., 66,654 miles from Earth).

Much of the above from:

www.spacelaunchreport.com/jupiter5.html

With the very same incredible photo:

www.spacelaunchreport.com/am11.jpg
Credit: Space Launch Report website

afspacemuseum.org/library/histories/Army.pdf
Air Force Space Museum website

sa09 (AS-103)_v_bw_o_n (NASA-Marshall Photo 5-19619) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

sa09 (AS-103)_v_bw_o_n (NASA-Marshall Photo 5-19619)

“The eighth Saturn I vehicle was launched February 16, 1965, from Launch Complex 37B at Cape Kennedy, Fla. The 18-story high rocket orbited the first Pegasus meteoroid detection satellite. The eighth vehicle to be flown, SA-9, was launched out of sequence before SA-8 because its assembly and ground testing were completed earlier.”

ttn_v_bw_o_n (official USAF photo, PL-65-64666 9710047-328, first Titan IIIC) by Mike Acs

© Mike Acs, all rights reserved.

ttn_v_bw_o_n (official USAF photo, PL-65-64666 9710047-328, first Titan IIIC)

TOTALLY KICK-ASS view of the first Titan IIIC at Launch Complex 40, being prepared for its 18 June 1965 launch.

And/or:

"Titan 3 C Mobile Service Tower pull back."

An AWESOME view.